Charles Percy Snow says that there is a
cultural difference between the humanities and social sciences and natural
sciences; that is, he asserts that there is a cultural gap between people in
the humanities and social science fields and people in the natural science
fields. He asserts that this will worsen, resulting in more gap between. He
mentions that if we can not resolve this gap then this will prevent us from
producing creative ideas or thoughts which need knowledge from both fields.
First of all, I am quite surprised by the
phenomenon which Charles Percy Snow points out because this phenomenon can be
clearly seen in Korea where I grew up; in Korea, definitely ‘two cultures’
exist; and there is too obvious reason behind this; In Korea, from sophomore in
high school, students need to decide between two fields, that is, the ‘liberal
arts’ and ‘natural sciences’. Then, they will be divided by this choice; from
that point, they will take different classes, using different classrooms; they
barely meet each other at school. Therefore, even though students hang out
during their freshmen year, they feel like they are different from sophomore
year if they choose different fields. After entering colleges and later, the
discrepancies between these two groups get worsen.
To resolve the gap between these cultures, integration
of academic disciplines is occurring in education even though students
themselves do not have enough interest in this integration. As Charles
mentions, I believe that, in order to produce a creative idea which can help
our world as a whole, reducing the gap between two cultures is very critical. As
a chemistry major, I also believe that we are living in the new era where arts and
humanistic knowledge are essential even beyond just the required level at
school to be a successful scientist. Nowadays, science and technology are not
just technique; and these should create technology which includes humanistic
values in it; that is, technology will be for people in a global community. For
this, we should not only have expertise in specific area but also understand
and include the ‘value’ and ‘human’ into the technology. In the future, I want to contribute to the
world by combining the arts, humanities and science technology all together. Through
this class, I would like to learn a lot so that I can be a chemistry student
who has both arts knowledge and science.
Approach to culture should be comprehensive. |
REFERENCES
“Approach to culture should be comprehensive”. Hangyeorye, n.d. Web. 3 April. 2016
Choi, Sungwoo. "The third culture and science technology." 2004. Print.
Snow, C. P. “Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution.” Reading. 1959. New York: Cambridge UP,1961. Print.
Vesna, Victoria. "Toward a Third Culture: Being In Between." Leonardo. 34 (2001): 121-125. Print.
“Visualization of structural chemistry is evolving.…With
artistry”. Hangyeorye, n.d. Web. 3 April. 2016
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you, and Snow, when you talk about integrating art and science together. Like you, I believe art and science should be combined and no longer be seen as "two cultures" because they are constantly integrated with one another. Great blog post, I really enjoyed it!
ReplyDelete